
Proiectul de lege pentru climă și natură va distruge economia Regatului Unit și va pune capăt proprietății private – The Expose
Proiectul de lege privind climă și natură are a doua lectură în Parlament la 24 ianuarie 2025. Dacă devine lege, va introduce re-sălbația obligatorie a mai mult de 30% din Regatul Unit și va introduce controale asupra călătoriilor și consumului.
„Puteți crede că toate proiectele de lege care au trecut deja prin Parlament în ultimele șase luni au fost dezastruoase și au reprezentat un atac asupra modului nostru de viață, culturii și economiei noastre. Dar mai urmează ceva care este la fel de rău sau chiar mai rău ca tot ce s-a întâmplat înainte. Și acesta este ceva numit Bill Climate and Nature”, a spus David Kurten.
„Va distruge economia, în esență, și va da guvernului puteri asupra proprietății tale private… Din cauza [something to do with] clima sau… natura, atunci guvernul vă poate lua în esență proprietatea”, a avertizat el. „Pentru că tot ceea ce se întâmplă în țară va trebui să fie dator față de obiectivele din acest proiect de lege privind clima și natura.”
Să nu pierdem contactul… Guvernul dvs. și Big Tech încearcă în mod activ să cenzureze informațiile raportate de The Expune pentru a-și servi propriile nevoi. Abonați-vă acum pentru a vă asigura că primiți cele mai recente știri necenzurate în căsuța dvs. de e-mail…
Mai jos este un rezumat al videoclipului lui David Kurten. Dar înainte de a ajunge la asta, o scurtă mențiune despre constituția Regatului Unit.
Constituția Regatului Unit este un sistem complex de reguli și principii care guvernează Regatul Unit („Marea Britanie”). Spre deosebire de multe alte țări, Regatul Unit nu are un singur document de constituție codificat. Sursele constituției Marii Britanii sunt actele Parlamentului Regatului Unit, convențiile, dreptul comun și lucrările autorizate, cum ar fi Albert Venn Dicey.
Constituția Regatului Unit pune oamenii la conducere și limitează puterile Guvernului. Legislativul, fiind Camera Parlamentului și Camera Lorzilor, au permisiunea de a face legislație, dar sunt supuse dreptului constituțional. După cum i-a explicat William Keyte lui Richard Vodes în 2023, „Legea constituțională… limitează absolut ceea ce [the Government] poate face în mod legitim. Ar mai putea să iasă afară, dar apoi ar acţiona criminal.”
Magna Carta (1215)una dintre sursele Constituției Regatului Unit, pe care Keyte o consideră DOCUMENTUL constituțional, este încă obligatorie pentru guvernul Regatului Unit și astăzi. Cunoscută și sub denumirea de Marea Cartă a Libertăților (sau Libertăților), a stabilit principiul conform căruia regele și guvernul erau supuse statului de drept și le limitau puterile. „[Magna Carta] frunze [the people] să fie stăpâni de sine, în esență, iar guvernul să iasă din cale și să-i lase în pace”, a spus Keyte. „[Magna Carta] ridică poporul deasupra propriului guvern.”
Alte resurse: Constituția de drept comun
Magna Carta se referă în mod explicit la Constituția spirituală și la Constituția temporală. Domeniul spiritual se referă la biserica creștină. Tărâmul temporal se referă la chestiuni seculare sau lumești. Bunurile comune se referă la oameni.
În contextul Declarația engleză a drepturilor„Lords Spiritual”, „Lords Temporal” și „Commons” se referă la episcopii Bisericii Angliei care stau în Camera Lorzilor, membri laici ai Camerei Lorzilor și reprezentanți aleși ai poporului, formând Camera Comunelor. , respectiv.
Înrudit: Declarația engleză a drepturilor: sunteți englez, nu britanic
Acesta este sensul paragrafului de la începutul proiectului de lege privind climă și natură.
Atât regele Carol, cât și guvernul sunt supuși statului de drept și constituției. Dacă se constată că acţionează în afara ceea ce permite constituţia, acţionează penal.
Magna Carta „rezerve pentru… tuturor Persoanelor, atât Spirituale, cât și Temporale, tuturor lor [free Liberties] şi vamă liberă, pe care le-au avut în timp trecut.
„Și toate aceste Obiceiuri și Libertăți menționate mai sus, pe care le-am dat să fie păstrate în acest Tărâm al nostru, [as much as appertaineth to Us and our Heirs, we shall observe; and] toți oamenii din acest tărâm al nostru, atât spirituali cât și temporali, [as much as in them is, shall observe the same against all Persons, in like wise.”
In other words, neither the king nor the government, nor anyone else, can remove our liberties and customs that we have had for thousands of years. The earliest surviving record of our liberties is King Alfred’s Doombook (c. 600 A.D). It was the foundation on which Magna Carta was built. The Ten Commandments were a particularly important model for the drafting of Anglo-Saxon law codes and formed part of the preface to King Alfred’s law book, grounding the secular laws in biblical precedents. God’s law is also specifically referenced in the longest Anglo-Saxon law code, which was issued by King Cnut.
Rather than specifying what people can do, the majority of the Ten Commandments specify what people cannot do. In short, if it is not prohibited by God then it is one of our liberties or inalienable rights.
Read more: Charles III and Keir Starmer have violated the rule of law and must step down
If, through the Climate and Nature Bill, King Charles and the Government remove any of our ancient liberties or customs then the monarch and the Government are acting unconstitutionally, and criminally.
Keep in mind what our liberties and inalienable rights are as we see from David Kurten’s explanation of what hundreds of politicians are attempting to push through as legislation.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
Table of Contents
The Climate and Nature Bill: An Overview
The Climate and Nature (“CAN”) Bill, first introduced by former Green Member of Parliament (“MP”) Caroline Lucas, has been reintroduced by Liberal Democrat MP Ros Savage and is set to have its second reading in the House of Commons next Friday, 24 January.
The Bill has gained significant support from more than 190 politicians across the Commons, Lords and local councils, largely due to lobbying efforts by the non-governmental organisation Zero Hour. (You can see a full list of MPs supporting the CAN Bill HERE and view an interactive map of MPs supporting the Bill HERE.)
The Bill builds on the existing Committee on Climate Change, established in 2008, and would give this committee more power to dictate the country’s climate strategy and targets. It aims to require the UK to achieve climate and nature targets, giving the Secretary of State the duty to implement a strategy to achieve these targets, and establishing a climate and nature assembly to advise on the strategy.
It would also grant the government powers to take control of private property if deemed necessary for climate or nature-related reasons, potentially destroying the economy and undermining private property rights.
The ultimate goal of the bill is to achieve net zero carbon dioxide emissions by 2050, with interim targets and a binding strategy to be implemented by the Secretary of State for Climate. It requires the UK government to fulfil its obligations and commitments under the UNFCCC and the Paris Agreement, which involves cutting carbon dioxide emissions and limiting global temperature increases.
The CAN Bill aims to ensure the United Kingdom reduces its overall contribution to global greenhouse gas emissions to “Net Zero” by 2030, at a rate consistent with limiting the global mean temperature increase to 1.5° C compared to pre-industrial levels.
Its objectives are based on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (“IPPC’s”) definition of pre-industrial levels, which dates back to around 1750, a time after the medieval warm period and before the mini ice age.
Nature and Biodiversity Provisions
In addition to addressing climate change, the Bill also focuses on nature and biodiversity, with the government aiming to halt and reverse its overall contribution to the degradation and loss of nature in the UK and overseas.
The Government’s objectives include increasing the health, abundance, diversity and resilience of species populations, habitats and ecosystems, with the goal of putting nature on the path of recovery by 2030.
It references the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, which is a framework for meeting biodiversity targets and objectives. However, the bill’s measures may not effectively address the issues of nature and biodiversity, and may even exacerbate the problems.
For example, the implementation of the bill’s objectives may involve measures that could have unintended consequences, such as the destruction of habitats and the killing of birds due to the construction of wind turbines and solar panels.
The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework
The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework considers biodiversity fundamental to human well-being and a healthy planet and economic prosperity, and is being taken seriously by politicians who are introducing legislation to meet its goals.
The framework recognises and considers diverse value systems and concepts, including the rights of nature and the rights of “Mother Earth,” which is being used as the basis for a bill in the UK that would require the country to obey this framework.
2030 Agenda and Rewilding Implications
The CAN Bill is tied to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, which is a way to introduce communism and take away property rights under the guise of sustainability and a climate emergency.
The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework has 23 targets, including ensuring that at least 30% of degraded terrestrial, inland water and marine and coastal ecosystems are under effective restoration by 2030. This target is about rewilding and giving the government control over land, which would be particularly destructive in densely populated countries like the UK, where over 80% of the land is used for agriculture.
The CAN Bill aims to achieve sustainability targets by 2030 and additional targets by 2050, which may be destructive to the agricultural sector. It would give the Committee on Climate Change the power to tell the Secretary of State for Climate to requisition land and rewild it, potentially stopping agriculture on certain lands. The implementation of this bill would be devastating to farmers, farms and agriculture in the UK, which is already under attack through inheritance tax and extra business taxes.
Impacts on Homes, Consumption and Personal Freedom
Homeowners may be required to demolish and rebuild their houses to meet energy efficiency standards, with the possibility of remote control over energy usage.
The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework’s Target 16 aims to encourage sustainable consumption choices, reduce global consumption footprint and minimise waste by 2030, which may involve legislation and regulations to enforce lower consumption.
The World Economic Forum has expressed desires to limit meat consumption, private car ownership, air travel and clothing purchases, which could lead to a loss of individual liberty and freedom.
The implementation of 15-minute cities may restrict car travel, promoting active travel like walking and cycling, and limiting access to public transport for long-distance travel.
The proposed limits on clothing purchases are an overreach, infringing on individual freedom and the free market.
The overall goal of these measures is to reduce waste and promote sustainability, but they could, and will most likely, go too far, resembling communism and restricting personal choice.
Economic and Societal Consequences
The CAN Bill will be extremely destructive to the economy and way of life, as it will give the government power to essentially destroy private property and “decarbonise” the economy by getting rid of all carbon-based energy, including imports of gas and LNG from overseas.
The bill will restrict people’s freedom to decide what to do with their own money and use the free market, and will instead allow the government to control the economy.
It will have a devastating impact on the economy, potentially leading to its collapse, and will leave people with limited options for making a living, such as growing their own vegetables and selling them.
It’s worth noting the hypocrisy of those people who are pushing for the Bill. They will be the same people who attend climate summits and global summits and are often the most wasteful, using private jets to travel to these events four or five times a year.
We are at a crucial moment to stop the Bill from progressing through Parliament. To stop the bill, write to your MP and ask them to vote against it on 24 January.
